[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <84144f020802030253y596ca557w3a44a8601a13596d@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 12:53:02 +0200
From: "Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: "Nick Piggin" <npiggin@...e.de>
Cc: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, arjan@...ux.intel.com, mingo@...e.hu,
ak@...e.de, jens.axboe@...cle.com, James.Bottomley@...eleye.com,
andrea@...e.de, clameter@....com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
andrew.vasquez@...gic.com, willy@...ux.intel.com,
"Zach Brown" <zach.brown@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability issues
Hi Nick,
On Feb 3, 2008 11:52 AM, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de> wrote:
> +asmlinkage void smp_call_function_fast_interrupt(void)
> +{
[snip]
> + while (!list_empty(&list)) {
> + struct call_single_data *data;
> +
> + data = list_entry(list.next, struct call_single_data, list);
> + list_del(&data->list);
> +
> + data->func(data->info);
> + if (data->wait) {
> + smp_mb();
> + data->wait = 0;
Why do we need smp_mb() here (maybe add a comment to keep
Andrew/checkpatch happy)?
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists