[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080203115801.GA22650@wotan.suse.de>
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 12:58:01 +0100
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Cc: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, arjan@...ux.intel.com, mingo@...e.hu,
ak@...e.de, jens.axboe@...cle.com, James.Bottomley@...eleye.com,
andrea@...e.de, clameter@....com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
andrew.vasquez@...gic.com, willy@...ux.intel.com,
Zach Brown <zach.brown@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability issues
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 12:53:02PM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Hi Nick,
>
> On Feb 3, 2008 11:52 AM, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de> wrote:
> > +asmlinkage void smp_call_function_fast_interrupt(void)
> > +{
>
> [snip]
>
> > + while (!list_empty(&list)) {
> > + struct call_single_data *data;
> > +
> > + data = list_entry(list.next, struct call_single_data, list);
> > + list_del(&data->list);
> > +
> > + data->func(data->info);
> > + if (data->wait) {
> > + smp_mb();
> > + data->wait = 0;
>
> Why do we need smp_mb() here (maybe add a comment to keep
> Andrew/checkpatch happy)?
Yeah, definitely... it's just a really basic RFC, but I should get
into the habit of just doing it anyway.
Thanks,
Nick
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists