[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080204133810.0077ec0d.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 13:38:10 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>
Cc: legoater@...e.fr, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
containers@...ts.osdl.org, xemul@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] extend clone_flags using parent_tidptr argument
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 14:24:16 -0600
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com> wrote:
> Quoting Cedric Le Goater (legoater@...e.fr):
> > From: Cedric Le Goater <clg@...ibm.com>
> >
> > We have at least 2 patchsets requiring each a new clone flag and there it
> > is, we've reached the limit, none are left.
> > This patch uses the CLONE_DETACHED flag (unused) as a marker to extend the
>
> Are we pretty sure that there is no legacy software out there which has
> continued to specify CLONE_DETACHED since the kernel ignores it?
Please see -mm's
clone-prepare-to-recycle-clone_detached-and-clone_stopped.patch
That patch has been cut back to only recycle CLONE_STOPPED because there
indeed was software out there which is setting CLONE_DETACHED.
See http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/Kernel/2007-11/msg04293.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists