[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47A81C5B.9080000@free.fr>
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 09:20:43 +0100
From: Cedric Le Goater <legoater@...e.fr>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
containers@...ts.osdl.org, xemul@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] extend clone_flags using parent_tidptr argument
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 14:24:16 -0600
> "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> Quoting Cedric Le Goater (legoater@...e.fr):
>>> From: Cedric Le Goater <clg@...ibm.com>
>>>
>>> We have at least 2 patchsets requiring each a new clone flag and there it
>>> is, we've reached the limit, none are left.
>>> This patch uses the CLONE_DETACHED flag (unused) as a marker to extend the
>> Are we pretty sure that there is no legacy software out there which has
>> continued to specify CLONE_DETACHED since the kernel ignores it?
>
> Please see -mm's
> clone-prepare-to-recycle-clone_detached-and-clone_stopped.patch
>
> That patch has been cut back to only recycle CLONE_STOPPED because there
> indeed was software out there which is setting CLONE_DETACHED.
>
> See http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/Kernel/2007-11/msg04293.html
bummer, I used the wrong one :/
Thanks,
C.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists