[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080205090742.GA11087@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 14:37:42 +0530
From: Chirag Jog <chirag@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Tony Breeds <tony@...eyournoodle.com>
Cc: Sripathi Kodi <sripathik@...ibm.com>, paulus@...ba.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [POWERPC] Use a sensible default for clock_getres() in
the vdso.
* Tony Breeds <tony@...eyournoodle.com> [2008-02-05 16:16:48]:
> On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 07:32:59PM +0530, Sripathi Kodi wrote:
> > Hi Paul,
> >
> > On PPC, I see a disparity between clock_getres implementations in the
> > vdso and syscall. I am using a IBM Openpower hardware and 2.6.24 kernel
> > with CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS=y.
> >
> > clock_getres call for CLOCK_REALTIME returns 1 millisecond. However,
> > when I edit arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso*/gettimeofday.S to force it to use
> > sys_clock_getres, I get 1 nanosecond resolution. The code in vdso seems
> > to be returning some pre-defined (incorrect) variables.
> >
> > Could you please let me know the reason for this? Is it something that
> > should be fixed in vdso?
>
> Can you try the attached patch and see it if works for you?
I tried this patch.
It seems to solve the reported problem and give a 1ns resolution.
Thanks.
--
Cheers,
Chirag Jog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists