[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Xine.LNX.4.64.0802052100510.2122@us.intercode.com.au>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 21:02:36 +1100 (EST)
From: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: Oliver Pinter (Pintér Olivér)
<oliver.pntr@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [2.6.24 REGRESSION] BUG: Soft lockup - with VFS
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 09:31:43 +0100 "Oliver Pinter (Pintér Olivér)" <oliver.pntr@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > hi all!
> >
> > in the 2.6.24 become i some soft lockups with usb-phone, when i pluged
> > in the mobile, then the vfs-layer crashed. am afternoon can i the
> > .config send, and i bisected the kernel, when i have time.
> >
> > pictures from crash:
> > http://students.zipernowsky.hu/~oliverp/kernel/regression_2624/
>
> It looks like selinux's file_has_perm() is doing spin_lock() on an
> uninitialised (or already locked) spinlock.
Perplexing.
Do you have all of the lock debugging enabled?
- James
--
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists