[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1202219216.27371.24.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil>
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 08:46:56 -0500
From: Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "\"Oliver Pinter" (Pintér Olivér)"
<oliver.pntr@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
Subject: Re: [2.6.24 REGRESSION] BUG: Soft lockup - with VFS
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 21:39 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 09:31:43 +0100 "Oliver Pinter (Pintér Olivér)" <oliver.pntr@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > hi all!
> >
> > in the 2.6.24 become i some soft lockups with usb-phone, when i pluged
> > in the mobile, then the vfs-layer crashed. am afternoon can i the
> > .config send, and i bisected the kernel, when i have time.
> >
> > pictures from crash:
> > http://students.zipernowsky.hu/~oliverp/kernel/regression_2624/
>
> It looks like selinux's file_has_perm() is doing spin_lock() on an
> uninitialised (or already locked) spinlock.
The trace looks bogus to me - I don't see how file_has_perm() could have
been called there, and file_has_perm() doesn't directly take any spin
locks.
--
Stephen Smalley
National Security Agency
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists