[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47A8C2D8.3020603@zytor.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 12:11:04 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
michael.pyne@...mail.net, AAbdulla@...dia.com,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/4] forcedeth: fix MAC address detection on network card
(regression in 2.6.23)
Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> Indeed, that would work too... though we would need to put out a call
> for Gigabyte testers during 2.6.25-rc.
>
> It is an entirely reasonable scenario for NVIDIA to deploy a fix to
> Gigabyte, which would then return us to the same scenario we have today:
> some work and some don't.
>
> That's my main reason for leaning more conservative here.
>
If they deploy a fix, then the Gigabyte prefix will show up as a prefix,
rather than a suffix - no problem. That's actually the reason to deploy
that solution rather than relying on DMI.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists