lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080206130004.GC26817@elf.ucw.cz>
Date:	Wed, 6 Feb 2008 14:00:04 +0100
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:	"Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>
Cc:	?????? ??????????? <penguinista@...l.net.mk>,
	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-pci <linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
Subject: Re: PCIE ASPM support hangs my laptop pretty often

On Tue 2008-02-05 16:22:55, Kok, Auke wrote:
> ?????? ??????????? wrote:
> >>>>> I've patched my kernel with the PCIe ASPM and after setting
> >>>>> echo powersave > /sys/module/pcie_aspm/parameters/policy
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I started to experience random hangs of my laptop.
> >>>>> Hardware info:
> >>>>> Thinkpad x60s 1704-5UG
> >>>> the x60's chipset doesn't support ASPM properly afaik... bad idea.
> >>> Well, the code shouldn't then cause a crash of the machine :)
> >> The user enabled it specifically (where it is disabled by default)
> >>
> >> ASPM has been crashing e1000(e), which is why I've recently merged a patch
> >> to disable L1 ASPM for the onboard 82573 nic on those platforms.
> >>
> >> this new infrastructure should work in the default configuration - enabling
> >> ASPM where this system leaves it disabled is expected to give problems
> >> unless you know what you are doing.
> > 
> > In my defense, the patch documentation didn't say it doesn't work with my 
> > hardware, nor that it hangs the chipset :) and the promised 1.3w surelly 
> > looked nice.
> > 
> > So, are there any benefits of ASPM if I have it in the kernel but it's set to 
> > default? I got the impression that "default" means not much power savings?
> 
> did the Kconfig not come with a big fat (EXPERIMENTAL) ?

(EXPERIMENTAL) is something different from (KNOWN BROKEN).

If we know about broken setups, we should probably be blacklisting
them.

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ