[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080209100133.60406c00@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 10:01:33 -0800
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Pekka Paalanen <pq@....fi>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pq@....fi
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] x86: explicit call to mmiotrace in do_page_fault()
> default n
> help
> This will build a kernel module called mmiotrace.
> + Making this a built-in is heavily discouraged.
why is this? Wouldn't it be nice if distros just shipped with this in their kernel by default
for example?
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PAGE_FAULT_HANDLERS
> -static HLIST_HEAD(pf_handlers); /* protected by RCU */
> -static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(pf_handlers_writer);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MMIOTRACE_HOOKS
> +static pf_handler_func mmiotrace_pf_handler; /* protected by RCU */
> +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(mmiotrace_handler_lock);
>
> -void register_page_fault_handler(struct pf_handler *new_pfh)
> +int mmiotrace_register_pf(pf_handler_func new_pfh)
> {
> + int ret = 0;
> unsigned long flags;
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&pf_handlers_writer, flags);
> - hlist_add_head_rcu(&new_pfh->hlist, &pf_handlers);
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pf_handlers_writer, flags);
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&mmiotrace_handler_lock, flags);
> + if (mmiotrace_pf_handler)
> + ret = -EBUSY;
> + else
> + mmiotrace_pf_handler = new_pfh;
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mmiotrace_handler_lock, flags);
> + return ret;
> }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(register_page_fault_handler);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mmiotrace_register_pf);
why not use a weak function instead? should be a ton simpler.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists