[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0802092320380.6917@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 23:21:58 +0100 (CET)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
To: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...e.hu, fche@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 0/4] make pr_debug() dynamic
On Feb 8 2008 10:52, Jason Baron wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 02:42:14PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
>> On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 16:03 -0500, Jason Baron wrote:
>> > make the pr_debug() function dependent upon the new immediate infrastruture.
>>
>> What's wrong with klogd -c 8 or equivalent?
>
>Setting the loglevel higher, will not make pr_debug() calls visible. The only
>way to make them visible right now, is by re-compiling the kernel.
pr_debug() was IMHO meant to be a compile-time optimization
to throw out debug messages most people do not want.
If you want to switch on/off debugging messages, use
printk(KERN_DEBUG) [with klogd -c something] and not pr_debug!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists