[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080211163832.GA10777@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 11:38:32 -0500
From: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...e.hu, fche@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 0/4] make pr_debug() dynamic
On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 11:21:58PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> >>
> >> What's wrong with klogd -c 8 or equivalent?
> >
> >Setting the loglevel higher, will not make pr_debug() calls visible. The only
> >way to make them visible right now, is by re-compiling the kernel.
>
> pr_debug() was IMHO meant to be a compile-time optimization
> to throw out debug messages most people do not want.
>
> If you want to switch on/off debugging messages, use
> printk(KERN_DEBUG) [with klogd -c something] and not pr_debug!
true, we could turn pr_debug() calls into printk(KERN_DEBUG) calls, but there
is an overhead to all these extra printk functions calls. The way I have
implemented pr_debug(), there is no function call at all, in the off case.
To me pr_debug() is currently a compile option, b/c there is often a lot of
overhead to having it on. Being able to turn pr_debug() calls off/on in a
production environment, to get debugging data seems very valuable.
thanks,
-Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists