linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH?][arch/parisc/kernel/pci-dma.c] pcxl_dma_ops.alloc_noncoherent = pa11_dma_alloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080211164215.GM5299@parisc-linux.org>
Date:	Mon, 11 Feb 2008 09:42:15 -0700
From:	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
To:	Roel Kluin <12o3l@...cali.nl>
Cc:	kyle@...isc-linux.org, grundler@...isc-linux.org,
	linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH?][arch/parisc/kernel/pci-dma.c] pcxl_dma_ops.alloc_noncoherent = pa11_dma_alloc_consistent?

On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 05:23:33PM +0100, Roel Kluin wrote:
> duplicate pa11_dma_alloc_consistent; more appropriate appears
> pa11_dma_alloc_noncoherent here. 
> 
> Not tested, please confirm that this fix is correct

I don't think it is.  The memories are fading, so I don't recall why it
is we do it this way, but I'm pretty sure it's correct the way it is.

-- 
Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/