[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080210085735.GA13466@elte.hu>
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 09:57:35 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@....com.au>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [3/6] kgdb: core
* Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
> [...] And while you're at it please remove all the filenames in the
> top-of-file comments, not just in include/asm-generic/kgdb.h.
fixed: there was just one such file remaining: include/linux/kgdb.h.
> While we're at it is there a good reason to have that file at all,
> it's just function prototypes, and I'd say for now they should just go
> into linux/kgdb.h. If there's a a good reason why architectures
> should implement them as inlines we can move them back, but looking at
> the x86 implementation I doubt that's the case.
agreed, done.
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 09:02:25AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > thanks - i found Sam's mail meanwhile and addressed most of the
> > observations and updated the kgdb.git tree. I'll now check the threads
> > above whether i missed anything. (feel free to point it out if you
> > notice anything outright) As the changes have been janitorial only i
> > refrain from reposting the series once again. The latest shortlog is
> > below.
>
> It would be nice if you could move the kerneldoc comments to the
> proper place at least. [...]
i'd agree in general but this is really a special case, please look at
the context. This would duplicate all the kerneldoc headers for all
architectures. We'd have to move the same kerneldoc header to all
architecture arch/*/kernel/kgdb.c files. It's much nicer in
asm-generic/kgdb.h.
> Also it seems at least some of Jan's patches are missing aswell.
i dont think so. Which ones do you mean? I just reviewed them and they
are either already done, or moot (for kgdb complications that i objected
to and removed from this kgdb-x86 tree).
anyway, i've implemented all these (trivial) tweaks you just mentioned
and re-tested on 32-bit and 64-bit x86, backmerged the fixes to their
proper places, and pushed the clean series out again to:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mingo/linux-2.6-kgdb.git
tip e6ba396b65e2f08afb5d8924140b126427085203. Shortlog below.
Ingo
------------------>
Ingo Molnar (3):
pids: add pid_max prototype
uaccess: add probe_kernel_write()
x86: kgdb support
Jan Kiszka (1):
consoles: polling support, kgdboc
Jason Wessel (2):
kgdb: core
kgdb: document parameters
Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt | 5 +
arch/x86/Kconfig | 4 +
arch/x86/kernel/Makefile | 1 +
arch/x86/kernel/kgdb.c | 550 ++++++++++
drivers/char/tty_io.c | 47 +
drivers/serial/8250.c | 62 ++
drivers/serial/Kconfig | 3 +
drivers/serial/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/serial/kgdboc.c | 164 +++
drivers/serial/serial_core.c | 67 ++-
include/asm-generic/kgdb.h | 91 ++
include/asm-x86/kgdb.h | 85 ++
include/linux/kgdb.h | 333 ++++++
include/linux/pid.h | 2 +
include/linux/serial_core.h | 4 +
include/linux/tty_driver.h | 12 +
include/linux/uaccess.h | 22 +
kernel/Makefile | 1 +
kernel/kgdb.c | 2019 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
kernel/sysctl.c | 2 +-
lib/Kconfig.debug | 2 +
lib/Kconfig.kgdb | 37 +
22 files changed, 3512 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/kgdb.c
create mode 100644 drivers/serial/kgdboc.c
create mode 100644 include/asm-generic/kgdb.h
create mode 100644 include/asm-x86/kgdb.h
create mode 100644 include/linux/kgdb.h
create mode 100644 kernel/kgdb.c
create mode 100644 lib/Kconfig.kgdb
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists