linux-kernel - Re: [3/6] kgdb: core

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080210082624.GB10479@infradead.org>
Date:	Sun, 10 Feb 2008 03:26:24 -0500
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@....com.au>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [3/6] kgdb: core

On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 09:21:32AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Kerneldoc comments don't belong above the prototype of a function but 
> > the function body.
> 
> disagree - the best is to have it in both places - and in many places we 
> do that. Anyway, this is up to maintainer discretion.

Huh?  In both places is the worst idea ever.  It just means things
will 100% sure get out of sync.  And the reason why it should be at the
function declaration is because that's where the kerneldoc tool picks
it up.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/