[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47B06BBD.4050306@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 10:37:33 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
To: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
CC: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>,
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: preempt rcu bug on s390
Heiko Carstens wrote:
>> Does s390 start out in nohz mode? The reason I ask is that it feels like
>> an off-by-one error for the dynticks_progress_counter.
>
> Actually I forgot to add a few ifdefs to make the code do something :)
> That just reveals that we have a conflict with the dynticks implementation
> and s390's nohz that shows up in what rcu_irq_enter/exit assume.
> I didn't patch s390 and common code so it will work, but I think the
> patch you mentionened will fix the problem I reported.
> So I guess we should either convert s390 to use the generic dynticks
> implementation or disable preemptible rcu on s390 until we converted
> our code.
>
> Thanks for helping debugging this!
Heiko, thanks for reporting this.
This patch still didn't make it into -rc1, and it really should. Because
without this patch, PREEMPT_RCU and NO_HZ together is broken, on all boxes.
The patch is in Ingo's sched-devel git tree, as
9460545f81ea48b07dbb20456a8ede776d8ebc1b (last I checked) and titled:
rcu: add support for dynamic ticks and preempt rcu
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists