[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47B06B4E.1010704@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 10:35:42 -0500
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@....com.au>
Subject: Re: [17/19] ftrace: dynamic enabling/disabling of function calls
Hi Ingo and Steven,
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> From: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
>
> This patch adds a feature to dynamically replace the ftrace code
> with the jmps to allow a kernel with ftrace configured to run
> as fast as it can without it configured.
>
> The way this works, is on bootup, a ftrace function is registered
> to record the instruction pointer of all places that call the
> function.
>
> Later, a kthread is awoken once a second that performs a stop_machine,
> and replaces all the code that was called with a jmp over the call
> to ftrace. It only replaces what was found the previous time.
>
> e.g.
>
> call ftrace /* 5 bytes */
>
> is replaced with
>
> jmp 3f /* jmp is 2 bytes and we jump 3 forward */
> 3:
>
> When we want to enable ftrace for function tracing, the IP recording
> is removed, and stop_machine is called again to replace all the locations
> of that were recorded back to the call of ftrace. When it is disabled,
> we replace the code back to the jmp.
>
> Allocation is done by the kthread. If the ftrace recording function is
> called, and we don't have any record slots available, then we simply
> skip that call. Once a second a new page (if needed) is allocated for
> recording new ftrace function calls. A large batch is allocated at
> boot up to get most of the calls there.
>
> Because we do this via stop_machine, we don't have to worry about another
> CPU executing a ftrace call as we modify it. But we do need to worry
> about NMI's so all functions that might be called via nmi must be
> annotated with notrace_nmi. When this code is configured in, the NMI code
> will not call notrace.
I'd like to suggest that you can use djprobe-like solution here to eliminate
stop_machine.
The djprobe makes a bypass over that call instruction by using a kprobe,
and after replacing the call instruction, you can safely remove the bypass.
Here is an ols paper about djprobe.
http://www.kernel.org/doc/ols/2007/ols2007v1-pages-189-200.pdf
Thank you,
--
Masami Hiramatsu
Software Engineer
Hitachi Computer Products (America) Inc.
Software Solutions Division
e-mail: mhiramat@...hat.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists