[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080212215823.GB2144@martell.zuzino.mipt.ru>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:58:23 +0300
From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
To: Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@...jp.nec.com>
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>,
"Andrew G. Morgan" <morgan@...nel.org>, akpm@...l.org,
jmorris@...ei.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] exporting capability code/name pairs (try #4)
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 10:10:06AM +0900, Kohei KaiGai wrote:
> Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> >On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 06:42:09PM +0900, Kohei KaiGai wrote:
> >>[kaigai@...a ~]$ ls -R /sys/kernel/capability/
> >>/sys/kernel/capability/:
> >>codes names version
> >>
> >>/sys/kernel/capability/codes:
> >>0 10 12 14 16 18 2 21 23 25 27 29 30 32 4 6 8
> >>1 11 13 15 17 19 20 22 24 26 28 3 31 33 5 7 9
> >>
> >>/sys/kernel/capability/names:
> >>cap_audit_control cap_kill cap_net_raw cap_sys_nice
> >>cap_audit_write cap_lease cap_setfcap cap_sys_pacct
> >>cap_chown cap_linux_immutable cap_setgid cap_sys_ptrace
> >>cap_dac_override cap_mac_admin cap_setpcap cap_sys_rawio
> >>cap_dac_read_search cap_mac_override cap_setuid
> >>cap_sys_resource
> >>cap_fowner cap_mknod cap_sys_admin cap_sys_time
> >>cap_fsetid cap_net_admin cap_sys_boot
> >>cap_sys_tty_config
> >>cap_ipc_lock cap_net_bind_service cap_sys_chroot
> >>cap_ipc_owner cap_net_broadcast cap_sys_module
> >>[kaigai@...a ~]$ cat /sys/kernel/capability/codes/20
> >>cap_sys_pacct
> >>[kaigai@...a ~]$ cat /sys/kernel/capability/names/cap_mknod
> >>27
> >>[kaigai@...a ~]$
> >>--------------------------------------------------------
> >>Any comment please.
> >
> >You don't like 1 (one) /proc/capabilities, why?
>
> I have no preference whether a single /proc/capabilities, or the current
> approach.
> However, this idea requires a bit more cost to lookup a capability not
> sequencially.
And I'm sure far less memory wasted at runtime.
Also, adding config option for one file/directory seems ridiculous to
me. And changelog completely fails to mention why it is useful to lookup
capabilities by name and number -- CAP_SYS_* numbers are part of ABI,
they won't change.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists