linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PATCH] split up feature-removal-schedule.txt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080213165924.GB10129@suse.de>
Date:	Wed, 13 Feb 2008 08:59:24 -0800
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] split up feature-removal-schedule.txt

On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 11:22:02PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 23:04 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> > > In the big "linux-next" series of emails, David Miller suggested that
> > > the feature-removal-schedule file be broken up into little pieces, as it
> > > is causing merge problems for different trees.
> 
> I suggest the same for MAINTAINERS

Why, is it a merge problem for you?

I've merged lots of new entries into it over the years, and never had a
problem with it, but that just might be me...

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/