linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PATCH] split up feature-removal-schedule.txt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080213081832.23c0e5dc.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date:	Wed, 13 Feb 2008 08:18:32 -0800
From:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, gregkh@...e.de,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] split up feature-removal-schedule.txt

On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:22:02 -0800 Joe Perches wrote:

> On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 23:04 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> > > In the big "linux-next" series of emails, David Miller suggested that
> > > the feature-removal-schedule file be broken up into little pieces, as it
> > > is causing merge problems for different trees.
> 
> I suggest the same for MAINTAINERS
> 
> I'd prefer a Maintainers subdirectory.
> 
> I have such a tree.  Anyone want it?

I'd prefer that neither of them be split up...

The merge problems for either of them should be trivial.

---
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/