linux-kernel - Re: BTRFS partition usage...

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 12 Feb 2008 17:09:14 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	jengelh@...putergmbh.de
Cc:	chris.mason@...cle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, btrfs-devel@....oracle.com
Subject: Re: BTRFS partition usage...

From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:42:56 +0100 (CET)

> 
> On Feb 12 2008 15:38, David Miller wrote:
> >
> >> I still don't like the idea of btrfs trying to be smarter than a user
> >> who can partition up his system according to
> >> 	(a) his likes
> >> 	(b) system or hardware requirements or recommendations
> >> to align the superblock to a specific location.
> >
> >All of your beliefs are unfortunately without the understanding
> >of restrictions that exist in several partition layouts such
> >as the Sun disk label one.
> 
> (Time for Sun to switch!)

You can go update every sparc machine's firmware then, you
can't boot off of a device that doesn't use a sun disk
label.

Your expectations are unrealistic, and it's just simpler to
do something sane and follow the majority of existing practice
by putting the superblock a few blocks into the partition.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/