| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <47B24663.4070101@keyaccess.nl> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 02:22:43 +0100 From: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl> To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de> CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, chris.mason@...cle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, btrfs-devel@....oracle.com Subject: Re: BTRFS partition usage... On 13-02-08 00:42, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > x86 MSDOS partition table layout starts counting with sector 1, which is > (not so intuitively) starting at 0x7e00 (and there's no sector 0, > probably for safety). Well, each ptable format with its own quirks. I haven't followed this thread, but in case it matters -- this sounds fairly confused. Not sure what you're saying, but the MSDOS partition table has its root table in the very first sector on the disk, at offset 0x1be = 0x200 - 4 * sizeof(struct partition) - 2 (that is, 4 entries at the end of that first sector, followed by a 2-byte signature). That 0x7e00 that you are speaking of sounds somewhat like the _memory_ address the BIOS loads that first sector to: 0x7c00. It then jumps there to start the ball rolling but 0x7c00 is not an on-disk reality or anything. MS-DOS partition tables are furthermore fully outside the actual partitions themselves and as such I believe not all together relevant to the issue? (as said, not following along though...) Rene -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists