linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] acpi: change cpufreq tables to per

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <47B33278.3060408@sgi.com>
Date:	Wed, 13 Feb 2008 10:10:00 -0800
From:	Mike Travis <travis@....com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de, ak@...e.de, clameter@....com,
	steiner@....com, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	len.brown@...el.com, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] acpi: change cpufreq tables to per_cpu variables

Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:37:40 -0800
> Mike Travis <travis@....com> wrote:
> 
>> Change cpufreq tables from arrays to per_cpu variables in
>> drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c
>>
>> Based on linux-2.6.git + x86.git
> 
> I fixed a bunch of rejects in "[PATCH 1/4] cpufreq: change cpu freq tables
> to per_cpu variables" and it compiles OK.  But this one was beyond my
> should-i-repair-it threshold, sorry.

Should I rebase all the pending patches on 2.6.25-rc1 or 2.6.24-mm1
(or some other combination)?

Thanks,
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/