linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] acpi: change cpufreq tables to per

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080213114317.0698a2b2.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Wed, 13 Feb 2008 11:43:17 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Mike Travis <travis@....com>
Cc:	mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de, ak@...e.de, clameter@....com,
	steiner@....com, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	len.brown@...el.com, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] acpi: change cpufreq tables to per_cpu variables

On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 10:10:00 -0800
Mike Travis <travis@....com> wrote:

> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:37:40 -0800
> > Mike Travis <travis@....com> wrote:
> > 
> >> Change cpufreq tables from arrays to per_cpu variables in
> >> drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c
> >>
> >> Based on linux-2.6.git + x86.git
> > 
> > I fixed a bunch of rejects in "[PATCH 1/4] cpufreq: change cpu freq tables
> > to per_cpu variables" and it compiles OK.  But this one was beyond my
> > should-i-repair-it threshold, sorry.
> 
> Should I rebase all the pending patches on 2.6.25-rc1 or 2.6.24-mm1
> (or some other combination)?
> 

That depends on whether you have other things queued in one of the git
trees.  If not, against current mainline (which is later than 2.6.25-rc1!)
would suit.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/