linux-kernel - Re: [2.6 patch] #if 0 aoedev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080213225653.GK4355@coraid.com>
Date:	Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:56:53 -0500
From:	"Ed L. Cashin" <ecashin@...aid.com>
To:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
Cc:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] #if 0 aoedev_isbusy()

On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 12:05:37AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 11:03:35PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> > 
> > On Feb 13 2008 23:30, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > >
> > >This patch #if 0's the no longer used aoedev_isbusy().
> > 
> > Why not just remove it? (It can be resurrected from earlier
> > revisions should it be needed again.)
> 
> I've switched to doing #if 0 instead since this addresses the
> "It might be needed in the future." answer I otherwise sometimes
> got.
> 
> But if a maintainer wants to have such a function deleted instead that's 
> fine with me.

Hello.  That function can go away.  I have some changes pending, but
none of them use aoedev_isbusy.  Thanks for Cc-ing me.

-- 
  Ed L Cashin <ecashin@...aid.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/