linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Add MS_BIND

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <E1JPi3u-0002rp-Nz@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>
Date:	Thu, 14 Feb 2008 18:39:54 +0100
From:	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To:	trond.myklebust@....uio.no
CC:	miklos@...redi.hu, menage@...gle.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add MS_BIND_FLAGS mount flag

> > And I'm not against doing it with the "at*" variants, as Trond
> > suggested.
> 
> If you're going to change the syscall, then you should ensure that it
> solves _all_ the problems that are known at this time. Ignoring the
> automounter issue is just going to force us to redo the syscall in a
> couple of months...

Sure.

Although, an (almost) equivalent userspace code would be:

mount_fooat(int fd, const char *path)
{
	char tmpbuf[64];
	int tmpfd = openat(fd, path);

	sprintf(tmpbuf, "/proc/self/fd/%i", tmpfd);
	return mount_foo(tmpbuf, ...);
}

Or is there something (other than not requiring proc) that the *at
variant gives?

Miklos

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/