[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6599ad830802141005i52236f7ak337ffffb915ea8ce@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 10:05:04 -0800
From: "Paul Menage" <menage@...gle.com>
To: "Miklos Szeredi" <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add MS_BIND_FLAGS mount flag
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 9:31 AM, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> wrote:
>
> I deliberately not used the MS_* flags, which is currently a messy mix
> of things with totally different meanings.
>
> Does this solve all the issues?
We should add a size parameter either in the mount_params or as a
final argument, for future extensibility.
And we might as well include MNT_READONLY in the API on the assumption
that per-mount readonly will be available soon.
Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists