linux-kernel - Re: [patch 00/10] mount ownership and unprivileged mount syscall (v8)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080215010951.163fe10e.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Fri, 15 Feb 2008 01:09:51 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>, serue@...ibm.com,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Dave Hansen <haveblue@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/10] mount ownership and unprivileged mount syscall
 (v8)

On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 04:01:20 -0500 Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 10:21:03PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Linus has just merged all the VFS renaming patches, so the decks
> > are clear for looking at this work.
> > 
> > However David and Christoph are beavering away on the r-o-bind-mounts
> > patches and I expect that there will be overlaps with unprivileged mounts.
> > 
> > Could we coordinate things a bit please?  Decide who goes first, review
> > and maybe even test each others work, etc?
> 
> Al is setting up a git tree for VFS work.  per-mount r/o will go in
> as one of the first things, aswell as his rework of the path lookup
> logic to fix the intents mess.
> 

That didn't answer my question..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/