linux-kernel - Re: [patch 00/10] mount ownership and unprivileged mount syscall (v8)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080215091438.GA24386@infradead.org>
Date:	Fri, 15 Feb 2008 04:14:38 -0500
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>, serue@...ibm.com,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Dave Hansen <haveblue@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/10] mount ownership and unprivileged mount syscall
	(v8)

On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 01:09:51AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > However David and Christoph are beavering away on the r-o-bind-mounts
> > > patches and I expect that there will be overlaps with unprivileged mounts.
> > > 
> > > Could we coordinate things a bit please?  Decide who goes first, review
> > > and maybe even test each others work, etc?
> > 
> > Al is setting up a git tree for VFS work.  per-mount r/o will go in
> > as one of the first things, aswell as his rework of the path lookup
> > logic to fix the intents mess.
> > 
> 
> That didn't answer my question..

Well, Al as the defacto VFS maintainer will decide on the ordering.
Reviewing this stuff properly is still on my todo list, but currently
I'm busy with more important things.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/