linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86: sparse error in efi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.00.0802161910460.7583@apollo.tec.linutronix.de>
Date:	Sat, 16 Feb 2008 19:11:06 +0100 (CET)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86: sparse error in efi_32.c

On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Harvey Harrison wrote:

> include/linux/efi.h does not include asm/efi.h, efi.c and efi_64.c
> explicitly include both.  While not really right, add the include
> to efi_32.c until the header gets sorted out.
> 
> arch/x86/kernel/efi_32.c:42:6: warning: symbol 'efi_call_phys_prelog' was not declared. Should it be static?
> arch/x86/kernel/efi_32.c:84:6: warning: symbol 'efi_call_phys_epilog' was not declared. Should it be static?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>

Applied. Thanks

	 tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/