| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20080216000347.1ea90e91@core> Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:03:47 +0000 From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> To: Roel Kluin <12o3l@...cali.nl> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, arjan@...radead.org, sfr@...b.auug.org.au, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org Subject: Re: Announce: Linux-next (Or Andrew's dream :-)) On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:05:59 +0100 Roel Kluin <12o3l@...cali.nl> wrote: > Alan Cox wrote: > >> Evolution in nature and changes in code are different because in code junk > >> and bugs are constantly removed. In biology junk is allowed and may provide > >> a pool for future development. Linux development is intended and not > >> survival. > > > > I would be interested to see any evidence (rather than intuition) to > > support that, given that both appear to be the same kind of structure and > > that structure is nowadays fairly well understood. > > What do you mean with structure, the evolution? that both are a language? No that they show the same mathematical structure and behaviour - both are scale free networks. Alan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists