linux-kernel - Re: Announce: Linux-next (Or Andrew's dream :-))

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080215162121.317c7c1c.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:21:21 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	sfr@...b.auug.org.au, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: Announce: Linux-next (Or Andrew's dream  :-))

On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:09:43 +0000
Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk> wrote:

> For reference, even _I_ don't build test the entire set of ARM defconfigs -
> at about 7 minutes a build, 75 defconfigs, that's about 9 hours...  I
> just build those which are important to myself, hope that the others are
> fine, and rely on kautobuild finding any breakage.
> 

you need a better box ;)

cerfcube_defconfig:				35 seconds
carmeva_defconfig:				23 seconds
spitz_defconfig (one of the biggest):		45 seconds

so would a stupid `for i in arch/arm/configs/*' script be sufficient
coverage?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/