[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.00.0802180449430.13823@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 04:50:20 -0500 (EST)
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...shcourse.ca>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] linux/hdsmart.h: fix goofups
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 12:17:20 EST, "Robert P. J. Day" said:
>
> > if that header file isn't used by any kernel code, why bother having a
> > check for __KERNEL__ in the first place? it's being exported to
> > userspace unchecked:
> >
> > include/linux/Kbuild:header-y += hdsmart.h
> >
> > so why not just toss that check entirely? otherwise, you're going to
> > get a header file exported to userspace that has a superfluous
> > __KERNEL__ test in it.
>
> Umm... if the kernel isn't using it, why are we bothering to export
> it to userspace at all? Or is the kernel using something *else*
> that should be going to userspace instead?
beats me, i just observe 'em, i don't make those judgment calls. :-)
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry:
Have classroom, will lecture.
http://crashcourse.ca Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
========================================================================
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists