[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080218133140.GA21635@elte.hu>
Date:	Mon, 18 Feb 2008 14:31:40 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
Cc:	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>,
	sct@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] fs/jbd/journal.c: cleanups
* Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org> wrote:
> The following was meant 100% seriously:
> 
> This patch has been sent on:
> - 16 May 2006
> - 1 May 2006
> - 23 Apr 2006
ouch ...
i guess this explains what static code metrics already suggest:
   $ code-quality fs/ext3/ fs/ext4/
                                errors   lines of code   errors/KLOC
   fs/ext3/                        408           16055          25.4
   fs/ext4/                        394           25169          15.6
compared to:
   $ code-quality kernel/
                                errors   lines of code   errors/KLOC
   kernel/                         739           98759           7.4
and i guess our hope is now in:
   $ code-quality fs/btrfs/
                                errors   lines of code   errors/KLOC
   fs/btrfs/                       240           20556          11.6
(which hopefully will be a project done in a much more Linux-ish manner: 
open participation, the easy taking of patches, an inclusive, 
newbie-friendly contribution atmosphere, etc.)
	Ingo
ps. http://redhat.com/~mingo/x86.git/code-quality
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
