[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080218133140.GA21635@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 14:31:40 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
Cc: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>,
sct@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] fs/jbd/journal.c: cleanups
* Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org> wrote:
> The following was meant 100% seriously:
>
> This patch has been sent on:
> - 16 May 2006
> - 1 May 2006
> - 23 Apr 2006
ouch ...
i guess this explains what static code metrics already suggest:
$ code-quality fs/ext3/ fs/ext4/
errors lines of code errors/KLOC
fs/ext3/ 408 16055 25.4
fs/ext4/ 394 25169 15.6
compared to:
$ code-quality kernel/
errors lines of code errors/KLOC
kernel/ 739 98759 7.4
and i guess our hope is now in:
$ code-quality fs/btrfs/
errors lines of code errors/KLOC
fs/btrfs/ 240 20556 11.6
(which hopefully will be a project done in a much more Linux-ish manner:
open participation, the easy taking of patches, an inclusive,
newbie-friendly contribution atmosphere, etc.)
Ingo
ps. http://redhat.com/~mingo/x86.git/code-quality
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists