linux-kernel - Re: [2.6 patch] fs/jbd/journal.c: cleanups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080218135509.GC28851@elte.hu>
Date:	Mon, 18 Feb 2008 14:55:09 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>,
	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>, sct@...hat.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] fs/jbd/journal.c: cleanups


* Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu> wrote:

> > So please deal with it like most other subsystem maintainers do and 
> > stop complaining about "code churn" - nobody but you changes the 
> > ext3 codebase, it's one of the codebases least affected by general 
> > kernel flux, it's an ultimate "leaf" subsystem.
> 
> Right, sorry.  I misread the filename; I thought this was against 
> fs/jbd2, instead of fs/jbd.

Btw., if people have problems with rejects from trivial patches, the 
'mpatch' tool does wonders in resolving the easy ones:

  http://oss.oracle.com/~mason/mpatch/

when you get a .rej file, first check whether mpatch can resolve it 
conflict-free:

  mpatch -d kernel/somefile.c.rej

if there are no conflicts then:

  mpatch -a kernel/somefile.c.rej

quilt refresh, review the result and it's done in the majority of cases.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/