[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080219154149.GB11599@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:41:50 +0100
From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
To: Bastian Blank <bastian@...di.eu.org>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 07/13] Initialize per cpu lowcores on cpu hotplug.
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 04:38:56PM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 04:13:55PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 03:40:54PM +0100, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> > > + /*
> > > + * Only need to copy the first 512 bytes from address 0. But since
> > > + * the compiler emits a warning if src == NULL for memcpy use copy_page
> > > + * instead. Copies more than needed but this code is not performance
> > > + * critical.
> > > + */
> > > + copy_page(lowcore, &S390_lowcore);
> >
> > Boah, workaround alert. Why do you not fix the compiler?
>
> We need to copy from address 0 (that's where the lowcore resides). But gcc
> insists to complain if memcpy is used with src == NULL.. Now what?
Erm sorry, misread your question. Usually it's a bug to use memcpy with
src == NULL. In this case it's ok. So I think it's perfectly ok if gcc
emits a warning.
If you know of a better way to get around this please let me know.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists