linux-kernel - Re: atmel_spi clock polarity

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080220.185045.08317377.nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp>
Date:	Wed, 20 Feb 2008 18:50:45 +0900 (JST)
From:	Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp>
To:	hskinnemoen@...el.com
Cc:	david-b@...bell.net, spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: atmel_spi clock polarity

On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:34:46 +0100, Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...el.com> wrote:
> In that case, I think the best fix is to let NPCS0 stay selected
> permanently in MR and overwrite CSR0 with to the new slave's settings
> before asserting CS. But that's a more complicated change, and I don't
> know how it will affect the AT91RM9200 special cases.
> 
> So I suggest we merge your patch for 2.6.25, and try to optimize it
> for 2.6.26.

I absolutely agree.

> David, do you want me to pass on the patch with my signoff or just ask
> Andrew to add my Acked-by to the patch already in mm?

The patch in mm also lacks my Signed-off line.  I had thought Andrew
never take a patch without Signed-off line ;)

Should I resend my patch with my Signed-off and Haavard's Acked-by?

---
Atsushi Nemoto
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/