linux-kernel - Re: atmel_spi clock polarity

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200802201732.38932.david-b@pacbell.net>
Date:	Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:32:38 -0800
From:	David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
To:	Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...el.com>
Cc:	Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp>,
	spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: atmel_spi clock polarity

On Wednesday 20 February 2008, Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
> > 
> > Unfortunately it did not work.  The clock state did not change by
> > writing MR register.
> 
> Ok, thanks for testing.
> 
> In that case, I think the best fix is to let NPCS0 stay selected
> permanently in MR and overwrite CSR0 with to the new slave's settings
> before asserting CS. But that's a more complicated change, and I don't
> know how it will affect the AT91RM9200 special cases.

The rm9200 special cases which, ISTR, still don't work right ...


> So I suggest we merge your patch for 2.6.25, and try to optimize it
> for 2.6.26.
> 
> David, do you want me to pass on the patch with my signoff or just ask
> Andrew to add my Acked-by to the patch already in mm?

It'd be good to let Andrew have your ack.  It's already in MM, so
if I don't need to sign off it's nice to have less to do there.  :)

- Dave

 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/