[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080220084747.77553451.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 08:47:47 -0800
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: first tree
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 01:23:32 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Andy,
>
> On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:04:36 +0000 Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org> wrote:
> >
> > As devout believers in testing things early we test -mm and -git releases
> > as they drop. I am keen that we are able to continue this with the -next
> > tree once it gets going. Having just pulled this tree its not obvious how
> > I would communicate which tree I had tested. I guess we could use the
> > SHA1 of the actual head used, but that really is cumbersome for the poor
> > people who have to check the results and actually report things to lkml.
>
> I hope I have addressed this issue by tagging each tree with its date
> i.e. todays was next-20080220.
>
> > Also will you be producing any tarballs for these releases? If so I
> > would say they would definatly need to be against some common base, like
> > against the nearest official tag "below".
>
> I hadn't considered tarballs, but I will give it some thought.
I'd like to see tarballs too, please...
---
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists