[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47BD55F6.5030203@firstfloor.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 11:44:06 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
CC: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>, akpm@...l.org,
torvalds@...l.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Document huge memory/cache overhead of memory controller
in Kconfig
> 1. We could create something similar to mem_map, we would need to handle 4
4? At least x86 mainline only has two ways now. flatmem and vmemmap.
> different ways of creating mem_map.
Well it would be only a single way to create the "aux memory controller
map" (or however it will be called). Basically just a call to single
function from a few different places.
> 2. On x86 with 64 GB ram,
First i386 with 64GB just doesn't work, at least not with default 3:1
split. Just calculate it yourself how much of the lowmem area is left
after the 64GB mem_map is allocated. Typical rule of thumb is that 16GB
is the realistic limit for 32bit x86 kernels. Worrying about
anything more does not make much sense.
> if we decided to use vmalloc space, we would need 64
> MB of vmalloc'ed memory
Yes and if you increase mem_map you need exactly the same space
in lowmem too. So increasing the vmalloc reservation for this is
equivalent. Just make sure you use highmem backed vmalloc.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists