[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4d569c330802210717g48d60229t56dd31f9828bad88@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:17:19 -0500
From: "Kevin Coffman" <kwc@...i.umich.edu>
To: "David Howells" <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: "Daniel Phillips" <phillips@...nq.net>, Trond.Myklebust@...app.com,
nfsv4@...ux-nfs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, selinux@...ho.nsa.gov,
casey@...aufler-ca.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/37] Permit filesystem local caching
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 9:55 AM, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
> Daniel Phillips <phillips@...nq.net> wrote:
>
>
> > Have you got before/after benchmark results?
>
> See attached.
>
> These show a couple of things:
>
> (1) Dealing with lots of metadata slows things down a lot. Note the result of
> looking and reading lots of small files with tar (the last result). The
> NFS client has to both consult the NFS server *and* the cache. Not only
> that, but any asynchronicity the cache may like to do is rendered
> ineffective by the fact tar wants to do a read on a file pretty much
> directly after opening it.
>
> (2) Getting metadata from the local disk fs is slower than pulling it across
> an unshared gigabit ethernet from a server that already has it in memory.
Hi David,
Your results remind me of this in case you're interested...
http://www.citi.umich.edu/techreports/reports/citi-tr-92-3.pdf
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists