lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 01:58:17 +0300 From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com> To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>, Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>, Glenn Streiff <gstreiff@...Effect.com>, Faisal Latif <flatif@...Effect.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, general@...ts.openfabrics.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Subject: Re: Merging of completely unreviewed drivers On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 02:43:15PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 01:33:03AM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 01:14:55PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > Quite frankly, I've several times been *this* close (holds up fingers so > > > you can't even see between them) to just remove checkpatch entirely. > > > > Agrh! What stopped you?! > > > > > I'm personally of the opinion that a lot of checkpatch "fixes" are > > > anything but. That mainly concerns fixing overlong lines (where the > > > "fixed" version is usually worse than the original), but it's been true > > > for some other warnings too. > > > > Speaking of driver, could authors please comment all those barrier() > > calls and remove trailing "return;" at the end of void functions. > > Why don't you make a patch to checkpatch.pl for those types of things? > :) Sorry, I'm not touching it with an eigthy six foot pole. :^) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists