lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47BF1E2F.1020203@firstfloor.org>
Date:	Fri, 22 Feb 2008 20:10:39 +0100
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: make amd quad core 8 socket system not be clustered_box

Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 11:07 AM, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
>> Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>  > On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
>>  >>  > so for that box [4, 0x23] still could be apic clustered? there is a hole [0,3]..
>>  >>
>>  >>  I meant holes between the CPUs only, not including the IO-APICs.
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >>  > is their box using AMD cpu or not?
>>  >>
>>  >>  Intel. AMD boxes don't really need clustered mode because they support
>>  >>  bigflat mode.
>>  >
>>  > So DMI or exclude AMD CPU?
>>
>>  Just check for holes between the cpus as I suggested earlier
> 
> how about their system that is not full populated with CPU?

I would expect the APIC IDs to be continuous then.

-Andi

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ