[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080222020615.GE27894@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 02:06:15 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: David Newall <davidn@...idnewall.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>,
Glenn Streiff <gstreiff@...Effect.com>,
Faisal Latif <flatif@...Effect.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, general@...ts.openfabrics.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@...ah.com>
Subject: Re: Merging of completely unreviewed drivers
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 12:16:45PM +1030, David Newall wrote:
> Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
> > Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> writes:
> >> I'm personally of the opinion that a lot of checkpatch "fixes" are
> >> anything but. That mainly concerns fixing overlong lines
> >>
> >
> > Perhaps we should increase line length limit, 132 should be fine.
> > Especially useful with long printk() lines and long arithmetic
> > expressions.
> >
>
>
> Yes; or even longer. 80 characters might have made sense on a screen
> when the alternative was 80 characters on a punched card, but on a
> modern computer it's very restrictive. That's especially true with the
> deep indents that you quickly get in C
... if your style is lousy. I agree that situation with printks is
not normal in that respect and I certainly have no love for the
checkpatch nonsense, but pressure to keep the fucking nesting depth
low is a Good Thing(tm).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists