[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m3myptsp8u.fsf@maximus.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 03:23:45 +0100
From: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: David Newall <davidn@...idnewall.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>,
Glenn Streiff <gstreiff@...Effect.com>,
Faisal Latif <flatif@...Effect.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, general@...ts.openfabrics.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@...ah.com>
Subject: Re: Merging of completely unreviewed drivers
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk> writes:
> ... if your style is lousy. I agree that situation with printks is
> not normal in that respect and I certainly have no love for the
> checkpatch nonsense, but pressure to keep the fucking nesting depth
> low is a Good Thing(tm).
Indeed. Unfortunately it is orthogonal to the line length limit.
We should limit the nesting level, though I think there is no
universally good value. What is good for one case (a function with a
short multi-level if/for/etc) is bad for another (a long switch()
where any added complexity makes it unparseable).
So I think it just have to meet the author's and reviewers' taste. We
already depend on this.
--
Krzysztof Halasa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists