linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] amiserial: Prepare for locking relaxation in caller.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080223000525.19ed29ba.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Sat, 23 Feb 2008 00:05:25 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] amiserial: Prepare for locking relaxation in caller.

On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 20:11:01 +0000 Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:

> 
> Just wrap this one in a lock_kernel. As I understand it there is no M68K
> SMP anyway.
> 

I assume that all the bkl/locking patches are prerequisites for
tty-bkl-pushdown.patch, and that they don't depend upon
tty-bkl-pushdown.patch?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/