linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] Cpusets API: Update cpusets to use cgroup structured file API

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080223000631.f4c1dbf4.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Sat, 23 Feb 2008 00:06:31 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>
Cc:	pj@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Cpusets API: Update cpusets to use cgroup
 structured file API

On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 20:54:10 -0800 Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com> wrote:

> Many of the cpusets control files are simple integer values, which
> don't require the overhead of memory allocations for reads and writes.
> 
> Move the handlers for these control files into cpuset_read_uint() and
> cpuset_write_uint(). This also has the advantage that the control
> files show up as "u64" rather than "string" in the cgroup.api file.

again, the naming here is a bit misleading - s/uint/u64/ would be clearer.

It is unclear to me what the relationship is between this and your other
cgroup pseudo-fs changes, but as this is fiddling with a userspace
interface we should get a wiggle on - we don't want to let things like this
slip out to 2.6.26.

So..  please resend everything?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/