linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] alloc_percpu() fails to allocate percpu data

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 23 Feb 2008 00:04:48 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
Cc:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
	"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] alloc_percpu() fails to allocate percpu data

On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 19:00:03 +0100 Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com> wrote:

> +#ifndef cache_line_size
> +#define cache_line_size()	L1_CACHE_BYTES
> +#endif

argh, you made me look.

Really cache_line_size() should be implemented in include/linux/cache.h. 
Then we tromp the stupid private implementations in slob.c and slub.c.

Then we wonder why x86 uses a custom cache_line_size(), but still uses
L1_CACHE_BYTES for its L1_CACHE_ALIGN().

Once we've answered that, we look at your

+	/*
+	 * We should make sure each CPU gets private memory.
+	 */
+	size = roundup(size, cache_line_size());

and wonder whether it should have used L1_CACHE_ALIGN().

I think I'd better stop looking.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/