| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1203953282.6242.180.camel@lappy>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 16:28:02 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: revert load_balance_monitor()
On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 20:05 +0530, Dhaval Giani wrote:
> This is funny. The thread should not start. Did the full revert that I
> sent you sometime back work better?
I suspect it are the change in sched_fair.c:load_balance_fair(). I
assumed those were to handle the case where tg->share != cpu share, but
would otherwise be similar. Apparently they are not.
Vatsa, would it make sense to take just that out, or just do a full
revert?
---
Subject: sched: fully revert load_balance_monitor()
The following commit causes a number of serious regressions:
commit 6b2d7700266b9402e12824e11e0099ae6a4a6a79
Author: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri Jan 25 21:08:00 2008 +0100
sched: group scheduler, fix fairness of cpu bandwidth allocation for task groups
Namely:
- very frequent wakeups on SMP, reported by PowerTop users.
- cacheline trashing on (large) SMP
- some latencies larger than 500ms
While there is a mergeable patch to fix the latter, the former issues
are IMHO not fixable in a manner suitable for .25 (we're at -rc3 now).
Hence I propose to revert this patch and try again for .26.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
CC: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 4
kernel/sched.c | 246 ++------------------------------------------------
kernel/sched_fair.c | 88 ++++++-----------
kernel/sysctl.c | 18 ---
4 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 309 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/sched.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/sched.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1541,10 +1541,6 @@ extern unsigned int sysctl_sched_child_r
extern unsigned int sysctl_sched_features;
extern unsigned int sysctl_sched_migration_cost;
extern unsigned int sysctl_sched_nr_migrate;
-#if defined(CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED) && defined(CONFIG_SMP)
-extern unsigned int sysctl_sched_min_bal_int_shares;
-extern unsigned int sysctl_sched_max_bal_int_shares;
-#endif
int sched_nr_latency_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
struct file *file, void __user *buffer, size_t *length,
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
@@ -174,41 +174,6 @@ struct task_group {
struct sched_entity **se;
/* runqueue "owned" by this group on each cpu */
struct cfs_rq **cfs_rq;
-
- /*
- * shares assigned to a task group governs how much of cpu bandwidth
- * is allocated to the group. The more shares a group has, the more is
- * the cpu bandwidth allocated to it.
- *
- * For ex, lets say that there are three task groups, A, B and C which
- * have been assigned shares 1000, 2000 and 3000 respectively. Then,
- * cpu bandwidth allocated by the scheduler to task groups A, B and C
- * should be:
- *
- * Bw(A) = 1000/(1000+2000+3000) * 100 = 16.66%
- * Bw(B) = 2000/(1000+2000+3000) * 100 = 33.33%
- * Bw(C) = 3000/(1000+2000+3000) * 100 = 50%
- *
- * The weight assigned to a task group's schedulable entities on every
- * cpu (task_group.se[a_cpu]->load.weight) is derived from the task
- * group's shares. For ex: lets say that task group A has been
- * assigned shares of 1000 and there are two CPUs in a system. Then,
- *
- * tg_A->se[0]->load.weight = tg_A->se[1]->load.weight = 1000;
- *
- * Note: It's not necessary that each of a task's group schedulable
- * entity have the same weight on all CPUs. If the group
- * has 2 of its tasks on CPU0 and 1 task on CPU1, then a
- * better distribution of weight could be:
- *
- * tg_A->se[0]->load.weight = 2/3 * 2000 = 1333
- * tg_A->se[1]->load.weight = 1/2 * 2000 = 667
- *
- * rebalance_shares() is responsible for distributing the shares of a
- * task groups like this among the group's schedulable entities across
- * cpus.
- *
- */
unsigned long shares;
#endif
@@ -250,22 +215,12 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(task_group_lock);
static DEFINE_MUTEX(doms_cur_mutex);
#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
-#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
-/* kernel thread that runs rebalance_shares() periodically */
-static struct task_struct *lb_monitor_task;
-static int load_balance_monitor(void *unused);
-#endif
-
-static void set_se_shares(struct sched_entity *se, unsigned long shares);
-
#ifdef CONFIG_USER_SCHED
# define INIT_TASK_GROUP_LOAD (2*NICE_0_LOAD)
#else
# define INIT_TASK_GROUP_LOAD NICE_0_LOAD
#endif
-#define MIN_GROUP_SHARES 2
-
static int init_task_group_load = INIT_TASK_GROUP_LOAD;
#endif
@@ -7083,21 +7038,6 @@ void __init sched_init_smp(void)
if (set_cpus_allowed(current, non_isolated_cpus) < 0)
BUG();
sched_init_granularity();
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
- if (nr_cpu_ids == 1)
- return;
-
- lb_monitor_task = kthread_create(load_balance_monitor, NULL,
- "group_balance");
- if (!IS_ERR(lb_monitor_task)) {
- lb_monitor_task->flags |= PF_NOFREEZE;
- wake_up_process(lb_monitor_task);
- } else {
- printk(KERN_ERR "Could not create load balance monitor thread"
- "(error = %ld) \n", PTR_ERR(lb_monitor_task));
- }
-#endif
}
#else
void __init sched_init_smp(void)
@@ -7418,157 +7358,6 @@ void set_curr_task(int cpu, struct task_
#ifdef CONFIG_GROUP_SCHED
-#if defined CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED && defined CONFIG_SMP
-/*
- * distribute shares of all task groups among their schedulable entities,
- * to reflect load distribution across cpus.
- */
-static int rebalance_shares(struct sched_domain *sd, int this_cpu)
-{
- struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq;
- struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(this_cpu);
- cpumask_t sdspan = sd->span;
- int balanced = 1;
-
- /* Walk thr' all the task groups that we have */
- for_each_leaf_cfs_rq(rq, cfs_rq) {
- int i;
- unsigned long total_load = 0, total_shares;
- struct task_group *tg = cfs_rq->tg;
-
- /* Gather total task load of this group across cpus */
- for_each_cpu_mask(i, sdspan)
- total_load += tg->cfs_rq[i]->load.weight;
-
- /* Nothing to do if this group has no load */
- if (!total_load)
- continue;
-
- /*
- * tg->shares represents the number of cpu shares the task group
- * is eligible to hold on a single cpu. On N cpus, it is
- * eligible to hold (N * tg->shares) number of cpu shares.
- */
- total_shares = tg->shares * cpus_weight(sdspan);
-
- /*
- * redistribute total_shares across cpus as per the task load
- * distribution.
- */
- for_each_cpu_mask(i, sdspan) {
- unsigned long local_load, local_shares;
-
- local_load = tg->cfs_rq[i]->load.weight;
- local_shares = (local_load * total_shares) / total_load;
- if (!local_shares)
- local_shares = MIN_GROUP_SHARES;
- if (local_shares == tg->se[i]->load.weight)
- continue;
-
- spin_lock_irq(&cpu_rq(i)->lock);
- set_se_shares(tg->se[i], local_shares);
- spin_unlock_irq(&cpu_rq(i)->lock);
- balanced = 0;
- }
- }
-
- return balanced;
-}
-
-/*
- * How frequently should we rebalance_shares() across cpus?
- *
- * The more frequently we rebalance shares, the more accurate is the fairness
- * of cpu bandwidth distribution between task groups. However higher frequency
- * also implies increased scheduling overhead.
- *
- * sysctl_sched_min_bal_int_shares represents the minimum interval between
- * consecutive calls to rebalance_shares() in the same sched domain.
- *
- * sysctl_sched_max_bal_int_shares represents the maximum interval between
- * consecutive calls to rebalance_shares() in the same sched domain.
- *
- * These settings allows for the appropriate trade-off between accuracy of
- * fairness and the associated overhead.
- *
- */
-
-/* default: 8ms, units: milliseconds */
-const_debug unsigned int sysctl_sched_min_bal_int_shares = 8;
-
-/* default: 128ms, units: milliseconds */
-const_debug unsigned int sysctl_sched_max_bal_int_shares = 128;
-
-/* kernel thread that runs rebalance_shares() periodically */
-static int load_balance_monitor(void *unused)
-{
- unsigned int timeout = sysctl_sched_min_bal_int_shares;
- struct sched_param schedparm;
- int ret;
-
- /*
- * We don't want this thread's execution to be limited by the shares
- * assigned to default group (init_task_group). Hence make it run
- * as a SCHED_RR RT task at the lowest priority.
- */
- schedparm.sched_priority = 1;
- ret = sched_setscheduler(current, SCHED_RR, &schedparm);
- if (ret)
- printk(KERN_ERR "Couldn't set SCHED_RR policy for load balance"
- " monitor thread (error = %d) \n", ret);
-
- while (!kthread_should_stop()) {
- int i, cpu, balanced = 1;
-
- /* Prevent cpus going down or coming up */
- get_online_cpus();
- /* lockout changes to doms_cur[] array */
- lock_doms_cur();
- /*
- * Enter a rcu read-side critical section to safely walk rq->sd
- * chain on various cpus and to walk task group list
- * (rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list) in rebalance_shares().
- */
- rcu_read_lock();
-
- for (i = 0; i < ndoms_cur; i++) {
- cpumask_t cpumap = doms_cur[i];
- struct sched_domain *sd = NULL, *sd_prev = NULL;
-
- cpu = first_cpu(cpumap);
-
- /* Find the highest domain at which to balance shares */
- for_each_domain(cpu, sd) {
- if (!(sd->flags & SD_LOAD_BALANCE))
- continue;
- sd_prev = sd;
- }
-
- sd = sd_prev;
- /* sd == NULL? No load balance reqd in this domain */
- if (!sd)
- continue;
-
- balanced &= rebalance_shares(sd, cpu);
- }
-
- rcu_read_unlock();
-
- unlock_doms_cur();
- put_online_cpus();
-
- if (!balanced)
- timeout = sysctl_sched_min_bal_int_shares;
- else if (timeout < sysctl_sched_max_bal_int_shares)
- timeout *= 2;
-
- msleep_interruptible(timeout);
- }
-
- return 0;
-}
-#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
-
#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
static void free_fair_sched_group(struct task_group *tg)
{
@@ -7835,29 +7624,25 @@ void sched_move_task(struct task_struct
}
#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
-/* rq->lock to be locked by caller */
static void set_se_shares(struct sched_entity *se, unsigned long shares)
{
struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = se->cfs_rq;
struct rq *rq = cfs_rq->rq;
int on_rq;
- if (!shares)
- shares = MIN_GROUP_SHARES;
+ spin_lock_irq(&rq->lock);
on_rq = se->on_rq;
- if (on_rq) {
+ if (on_rq)
dequeue_entity(cfs_rq, se, 0);
- dec_cpu_load(rq, se->load.weight);
- }
se->load.weight = shares;
se->load.inv_weight = div64_64((1ULL<<32), shares);
- if (on_rq) {
+ if (on_rq)
enqueue_entity(cfs_rq, se, 0);
- inc_cpu_load(rq, se->load.weight);
- }
+
+ spin_unlock_irq(&rq->lock);
}
static DEFINE_MUTEX(shares_mutex);
@@ -7867,18 +7652,18 @@ int sched_group_set_shares(struct task_g
int i;
unsigned long flags;
+ /*
+ * A weight of 0 or 1 can cause arithmetics problems.
+ * (The default weight is 1024 - so there's no practical
+ * limitation from this.)
+ */
+ if (shares < 2)
+ shares = 2;
+
mutex_lock(&shares_mutex);
if (tg->shares == shares)
goto done;
- if (shares < MIN_GROUP_SHARES)
- shares = MIN_GROUP_SHARES;
-
- /*
- * Prevent any load balance activity (rebalance_shares,
- * load_balance_fair) from referring to this group first,
- * by taking it off the rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list on each cpu.
- */
spin_lock_irqsave(&task_group_lock, flags);
for_each_possible_cpu(i)
unregister_fair_sched_group(tg, i);
@@ -7892,11 +7677,8 @@ int sched_group_set_shares(struct task_g
* w/o tripping rebalance_share or load_balance_fair.
*/
tg->shares = shares;
- for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
- spin_lock_irq(&cpu_rq(i)->lock);
+ for_each_possible_cpu(i)
set_se_shares(tg->se[i], shares);
- spin_unlock_irq(&cpu_rq(i)->lock);
- }
/*
* Enable load balance activity on this group, by inserting it back on
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched_fair.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched_fair.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched_fair.c
@@ -732,8 +732,6 @@ static inline struct sched_entity *paren
return se->parent;
}
-#define GROUP_IMBALANCE_PCT 20
-
#else /* CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED */
#define for_each_sched_entity(se) \
@@ -1191,6 +1189,25 @@ static struct task_struct *load_balance_
return __load_balance_iterator(cfs_rq, cfs_rq->rb_load_balance_curr);
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
+static int cfs_rq_best_prio(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
+{
+ struct sched_entity *curr;
+ struct task_struct *p;
+
+ if (!cfs_rq->nr_running)
+ return MAX_PRIO;
+
+ curr = cfs_rq->curr;
+ if (!curr)
+ curr = __pick_next_entity(cfs_rq);
+
+ p = task_of(curr);
+
+ return p->prio;
+}
+#endif
+
static unsigned long
load_balance_fair(struct rq *this_rq, int this_cpu, struct rq *busiest,
unsigned long max_load_move,
@@ -1200,45 +1217,28 @@ load_balance_fair(struct rq *this_rq, in
struct cfs_rq *busy_cfs_rq;
long rem_load_move = max_load_move;
struct rq_iterator cfs_rq_iterator;
- unsigned long load_moved;
cfs_rq_iterator.start = load_balance_start_fair;
cfs_rq_iterator.next = load_balance_next_fair;
for_each_leaf_cfs_rq(busiest, busy_cfs_rq) {
#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
- struct cfs_rq *this_cfs_rq = busy_cfs_rq->tg->cfs_rq[this_cpu];
- unsigned long maxload, task_load, group_weight;
- unsigned long thisload, per_task_load;
- struct sched_entity *se = busy_cfs_rq->tg->se[busiest->cpu];
-
- task_load = busy_cfs_rq->load.weight;
- group_weight = se->load.weight;
-
- /*
- * 'group_weight' is contributed by tasks of total weight
- * 'task_load'. To move 'rem_load_move' worth of weight only,
- * we need to move a maximum task load of:
- *
- * maxload = (remload / group_weight) * task_load;
- */
- maxload = (rem_load_move * task_load) / group_weight;
-
- if (!maxload || !task_load)
+ struct cfs_rq *this_cfs_rq;
+ long imbalance;
+ unsigned long maxload;
+
+ this_cfs_rq = cpu_cfs_rq(busy_cfs_rq, this_cpu);
+
+ imbalance = busy_cfs_rq->load.weight - this_cfs_rq->load.weight;
+ /* Don't pull if this_cfs_rq has more load than busy_cfs_rq */
+ if (imbalance <= 0)
continue;
- per_task_load = task_load / busy_cfs_rq->nr_running;
- /*
- * balance_tasks will try to forcibly move atleast one task if
- * possible (because of SCHED_LOAD_SCALE_FUZZ). Avoid that if
- * maxload is less than GROUP_IMBALANCE_FUZZ% the per_task_load.
- */
- if (100 * maxload < GROUP_IMBALANCE_PCT * per_task_load)
- continue;
+ /* Don't pull more than imbalance/2 */
+ imbalance /= 2;
+ maxload = min(rem_load_move, imbalance);
- /* Disable priority-based load balance */
- *this_best_prio = 0;
- thisload = this_cfs_rq->load.weight;
+ *this_best_prio = cfs_rq_best_prio(this_cfs_rq);
#else
# define maxload rem_load_move
#endif
@@ -1247,33 +1247,11 @@ load_balance_fair(struct rq *this_rq, in
* load_balance_[start|next]_fair iterators
*/
cfs_rq_iterator.arg = busy_cfs_rq;
- load_moved = balance_tasks(this_rq, this_cpu, busiest,
+ rem_load_move -= balance_tasks(this_rq, this_cpu, busiest,
maxload, sd, idle, all_pinned,
this_best_prio,
&cfs_rq_iterator);
-#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
- /*
- * load_moved holds the task load that was moved. The
- * effective (group) weight moved would be:
- * load_moved_eff = load_moved/task_load * group_weight;
- */
- load_moved = (group_weight * load_moved) / task_load;
-
- /* Adjust shares on both cpus to reflect load_moved */
- group_weight -= load_moved;
- set_se_shares(se, group_weight);
-
- se = busy_cfs_rq->tg->se[this_cpu];
- if (!thisload)
- group_weight = load_moved;
- else
- group_weight = se->load.weight + load_moved;
- set_se_shares(se, group_weight);
-#endif
-
- rem_load_move -= load_moved;
-
if (rem_load_move <= 0)
break;
}
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sysctl.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sysctl.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sysctl.c
@@ -311,24 +311,6 @@ static struct ctl_table kern_table[] = {
.mode = 0644,
.proc_handler = &proc_dointvec,
},
-#if defined(CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED) && defined(CONFIG_SMP)
- {
- .ctl_name = CTL_UNNUMBERED,
- .procname = "sched_min_bal_int_shares",
- .data = &sysctl_sched_min_bal_int_shares,
- .maxlen = sizeof(unsigned int),
- .mode = 0644,
- .proc_handler = &proc_dointvec,
- },
- {
- .ctl_name = CTL_UNNUMBERED,
- .procname = "sched_max_bal_int_shares",
- .data = &sysctl_sched_max_bal_int_shares,
- .maxlen = sizeof(unsigned int),
- .mode = 0644,
- .proc_handler = &proc_dointvec,
- },
-#endif
#endif
{
.ctl_name = CTL_UNNUMBERED,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists