linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sched: revert load_balance

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080225160155.GC21903@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:31:55 +0530
From:	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc:	Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: revert load_balance_monitor()

On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 04:28:02PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Vatsa, would it make sense to take just that out, or just do a full
> revert?

Peter,
	6b2d7700266b9402e12824e11e0099ae6a4a6a79 and 
58e2d4ca581167c2a079f4ee02be2f0bc52e8729 are related very much. The
later changes how cpu load is calculated for the former to work
properly.

I would suggest we do a full revert for now, until the latency issues are sorted
out.

-- 
Regards,
vatsa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/